Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-05-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-05-10 House Journal Page 4163 SB 382 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 9, 2004, calendar (page 4073), was read the third time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 382(CRA) am "An Act relating to replat approval; relating to the platting of right-of-way acquired through eminent domain proceedings; and providing for an effective date." Representative Wolf moved and asked unanimous consent that CSSB 382(CRA) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Wolf: Page 2, line 4: Delete "such as" Page 2, line 4: Delete "and State of Alaska" Page 2, line 5: Delete all material. Representative Wolf moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative McGuire objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Gara: 2004-05-10 House Journal Page 4164 Add to the amendment: "Page 2, line 3: Delete "and" Page 2, lines 3 - 4: Delete all material. Page 2, line 5: Delete "v. Hinkel, 3AN-04-4768 CI" Page 2, lines 20 - 22: Delete all material." Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 382(CRA) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 as amended YEAS: 18 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 6 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Moses, Ogg, Seaton, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Anderson, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Heinze, Holm, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Samuels, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams Absent: Chenault, Harris, Hawker, Joule, Meyer, Rokeberg Wilson changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 1 as amended was adopted. 2004-05-10 House Journal Page 4165 The question being: "Shall CSSB 382(CRA) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 382(CRA) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 31 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Heinze, Holm, Kapsner, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Coghill, Kerttula, Kohring, Stoltze Absent: Chenault, Harris, Hawker, Joule, Meyer And so, CSSB 382(CRA) am H passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative McGuire gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSSB 382(CRA) am H. SB 382 Representative McGuire moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSSB 382(CRA) am H be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 382(CRA) am H was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSSB 382(CRA) am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2004-05-10 House Journal Page 4166 CSSB 382(CRA) am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 31 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kapsner, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stepovich, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wolf Nays: Coghill, Gara, Gatto, Kerttula, Kohring, Stoltze, Wilson Absent: Harris, Joule Wilson changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Gatto changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, CSSB 382(CRA) am H passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSSB 382(CRA) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.